PCREE Testing in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Lessons From Real Facilities (Anonymized)

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) face real-world challenges in Patient Care-Related Electrical Equipment (PCREE) testing — from incomplete inventories to documentation gaps. The good news: facilities that adopt preventive programs, risk-based schedules, and thorough logs consistently avoid CMS deficiencies. These anonymized stories illustrate the difference between what works and what fails.

Why Real-World Lessons Matter

PCREE compliance often looks straightforward on paper: test equipment, keep records, stay compliant. But in practice, SNFs face staffing shortages, old equipment, and competing priorities. Surveyors don’t just want to see effort — they want proof.

Drawing on anonymized examples from facilities supported by Medical Equipment Repair Network (MERN), here are lessons that show what surveyors see and how to prepare.

Case Study 1: The Incomplete Inventory

The Problem:
A mid-sized SNF had never created a master inventory of PCREE. They relied on staff memory to know which devices needed testing. When surveyors asked for documentation, several infusion pumps and beds had no records.

Survey Result: Deficiency cited under CMS equipment safety requirements.

The Fix:
The facility built a full equipment inventory with serial numbers, locations, and categories. Within six months, they were able to produce accurate testing logs for every device.

Lesson Learned: If it’s not on paper (or digital log), it doesn’t exist to a surveyor.

Case Study 2: Skipped Receptacle Testing

The Problem:
Another facility performed annual leakage current testing on beds and pumps but never tested patient care-area receptacles. Staff assumed outlets were “facility infrastructure” and not part of PCREE compliance.

Survey Result: CMS surveyors flagged multiple outlets as untested, citing NFPA 99 requirements.

The Fix:
The facility added receptacle testing to their annual schedule (polarity, ground, retention). They also trained maintenance staff to conduct these tests and store results.

Lesson Learned: Outlets are part of the environment of care — ignoring them is one of the fastest ways to get cited.

Case Study 3: Reactive Repairs Gone Wrong

The Problem:
A large SNF used a reactive repair approach — fixing equipment only after it broke. One resident bed failed during survey week due to a frayed cord. Testing logs showed no preventive maintenance had been performed.

Survey Result: Immediate deficiency for failing to maintain safe equipment.

The Fix:
The facility shifted to preventive testing every 12 months and replaced aging cords proactively. Within a year, breakdowns dropped significantly.

Lesson Learned: Preventive testing costs less than the fallout from reactive repairs.

Case Study 4: Documentation Saves the Day

The Problem:
Surveyors visited a small SNF and asked for PCREE logs. Staff quickly produced electronic records showing test dates, results, technician names, and corrective actions for each device.

Survey Result: Surveyors were satisfied — no deficiencies cited.

The Fix:
This facility used a digital log and quarterly audits to ensure accuracy.

Lesson Learned: Good documentation can turn a stressful survey into a smooth process.

Common Themes Across Facilities

  • Inventory is always the starting point. Without it, you can’t prove compliance.

  • Receptacles are frequently overlooked. Yet they’re one of the first things surveyors check.

  • Preventive beats reactive. Emergencies cost more and increase risk.

  • Documentation is non-negotiable. If you can’t show it, it didn’t happen.

Key Takeaways

  • Real facilities show the gap between theory and practice.

  • CMS surveyors consistently look for complete inventories, preventive testing, receptacle checks, and documented results.

  • Facilities that prepare in advance rarely face citations — those that don’t often learn the hard way.

Resources

  • NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code

  • CMS State Operations Manual

  • OSHA Healthcare Electrical Safety

  • FDA Medical Device Guidance

Reviewed by the PCREE Test Compliance Team
Last Updated: September 2025

Previous
Previous

When Equipment Fails: Reporting Obligations & Post-Failure Testing

Next
Next

How Often Should You Test PCREE Equipment? A Risk-Based Approach